The Washington Post Parodies the Fact-Check Genre in El-Sayed’s Defense

In fact, the Senate candidate’s suspect views and associations speak for themselves.

Share this story

Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate Abdul El-Sayed speaks at a rally in Detroit, Mich., August 7, 2026.

Rebecca Cook/Reuters

It was already too late to salvage the fact-checking industry’s reputation before the Washington Post produced an example of the genre so obtuse and manipulative that it should seal the whole enterprise’s fate. WaPo reporter Violet Jira’s contribution to her profession’s discredit is particularly brazen.

In what was clearly an effort to defang the allegations that have forced Abdul El-Sayed into a defensive crouch in the final weeks of the midterm campaign, Jira dismissed Mike Rogers’s claim that El-Sayed has “ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Noah Rothman

About the Author

Noah Rothman

Noah Rothman is a senior writer at National Review. His third book, Blood and Progress: A Century of Left-Wing Violence, was published by Hachette in May 2026.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement